I have written an article on this topic. It's critical that we all upgrade our understanding of what the word "fact" means. In the same way that whether you "own" something or not depends on whether the courts will give it back to you if someone takes it from you, the label "fact" points to the intelligence of the crowd and what is considered certainly true by the consensus of the most-expert community among us on the topic.
Take, for example, the "fact" that once upon a time, Newtonian physics was believed to be the be-all-end-all of how the physical world behaved. It was called a fact - it was labeled a fact. When new information was brought into the community, they made a transformation about their consensus. It's that consensus which determines what is a fact and what isn't.
This understanding of what a fact is, and what truth is, is needed in order to see the kind of evidence which we need right now as a society to bring us together. We need to understand the bell-curve of consensus in the most informed community among us on a topic, where there are competing narratives to resolve. That's what Concordis is here to do.